Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Ants Aasma <ants@cybertec.at>, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Date: 2012-11-24T18:20:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 06:14:59PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian escribió:
> 
> > --- 17,24 ----
> >   
> >   static void transfer_single_new_db(pageCnvCtx *pageConverter,
> >   					   FileNameMap *maps, int size);
> > ! static int transfer_relfile(pageCnvCtx *pageConverter, FileNameMap *map,
> > ! 							 const char *suffix);
> 
> Uh, does this code assume that forks other than the main one are not
> split in segments?  I think that's a bug, is it not?

Actually, the segment scanning now happens inside transfer_relfile().

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +