Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Ants Aasma <ants@cybertec.at>, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Date: 2012-11-24T18:20:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 06:14:59PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian escribió: > > > --- 17,24 ---- > > > > static void transfer_single_new_db(pageCnvCtx *pageConverter, > > FileNameMap *maps, int size); > > ! static int transfer_relfile(pageCnvCtx *pageConverter, FileNameMap *map, > > ! const char *suffix); > > Uh, does this code assume that forks other than the main one are not > split in segments? I think that's a bug, is it not? Actually, the segment scanning now happens inside transfer_relfile(). -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +