Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Date: 2012-11-14T20:01:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane escribió: > Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes: > > The next quadratic behavior is in init_sequence. > > Yeah, that's another place that is using a linear list that perhaps > should be a hashtable. OTOH, probably most sessions don't touch enough > different sequences for that to be a win. Could we use some adaptive mechanism here? Say we use a list for the first ten entries, and if an eleventh one comes in, we create a hash table for that one and all subsequent ones. All future calls would have to examine both the list for the first few and then the hash table. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services