Horton
Menu

Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Ants Aasma <ants@cybertec.at>, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Date: 2012-11-12T21:22:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Bruce Momjian escribió:

> It is possible that the poor 16k pg_upgrade value is caused by the poor
> 9.2 binary-upgrade number (189.38).  Perhaps I need to hack up
> pg_upgrade to allow a 9.3 to 9.3 upgrade to test this.

Hmm?  This already works, since "make check" uses it, right?

--