Horton
Menu

Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

View thread
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-11-05T21:42:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Nov  5, 2012 at 04:39:27PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > AFAIR any transaction that modifies catalogs gets sync commit forcibly,
> > regardless of the setting.  And sync commit means you get to wait for
> > all previous transactions to be flushed as well.  So simply creating a
> > temp table ought to do the trick ...
> 
> I don't think there's a carve-out for system tables ... but creating a
> temp table with synchronous_commit=on will certainly do the trick.

What is a temp table writing to WAL?  The pg_class/pg_attribute changes?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +