Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga@uptime.jp>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-10-23T16:12:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Satoshi Nagayasu escribió:

> With this patch, walwriter process and each backend process
> would sum up dirty writes, and send it to the stat collector.
> So, the value could be saved in the stat file, and could be
> kept on restarting.
> 
> The statistics could be retreive with using
> pg_stat_get_xlog_dirty_writes() function, and could be reset
> with calling pg_stat_reset_shared('walwriter').
> 
> Now, I have one concern.
> 
> The reset time could be captured in globalStats.stat_reset_timestamp,
> but this value is the same with the bgwriter one.
> 
> So, once pg_stat_reset_shared('walwriter') is called,
> stats_reset column in pg_stat_bgwriter does represent
> the reset time for walwriter, not for bgwriter.
> 
> How should we handle this?  Should we split this value?
> And should we have new system view for walwriter?

I think the answer to the two last questions is yes.  It doesn't seem to
make sense, to me, to have a single reset timings for what are
effectively two separate things.

Please submit an updated patch to next CF.  I'm marking this one
returned with feedback.  Thanks.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services