Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-03-20T17:21:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Restructure SELECT INTO's parsetree representation into CreateTableAsStmt.
- 9dbf2b7d75de 9.2.0 cited
-
Extend the parser location infrastructure to include a location field in
- a2794623d292 8.4.0 cited
-
Teach eval_const_expressions() to simplify an ArrayCoerceExpr to a constant
- 6734182c169a 8.4.0 cited
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 08:48:07PM +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On 19 March 2012 19:55, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > > If someone wanted to bite the bullet and do the work, I think we could > > move to a Perl/TAP-based test suite (not pgTAP, but Perl and some fairly > > standard Test::* modules) and reduce that useless reformatting work and > > test more interesting things. Just a thought ... > > I think that that is a good idea. However, I am not a Perl hacker, > though this is the second time that that has left me at a disadvantage > when working on Postgres, so I think it's probably time to learn a > certain amount. My blog entry on this topic might be helpful: http://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2008.html#October_4_2008_2 -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +