Re: pg_upgrade and statistics

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2012-03-13T21:42:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:29:22PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> I went even lower than you suggested:
>  
> set default_statistics_target = 4;
>  
> And it was much faster, but still more time than the pg_upgrade run
> itself:
>  
> cir=# analyze;
> ANALYZE
> Time: 474319.826 ms
>  
> A little under 8 minutes.

What is the target=10 duration?  I think 10 is as low as we can
acceptably recommend.  Should we recommend they run vacuumdb twice, once
with default_statistics_target = 4, and another with the default?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +