Re: pg_upgrade and statistics
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2012-03-13T21:42:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:29:22PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: > I went even lower than you suggested: > > set default_statistics_target = 4; > > And it was much faster, but still more time than the pg_upgrade run > itself: > > cir=# analyze; > ANALYZE > Time: 474319.826 ms > > A little under 8 minutes. What is the target=10 duration? I think 10 is as low as we can acceptably recommend. Should we recommend they run vacuumdb twice, once with default_statistics_target = 4, and another with the default? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +