Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq
Cédric Villemain <cedric@2ndquadrant.fr>
From: Cédric Villemain <cedric@2ndquadrant.fr>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>, Alex Shulgin <ash@commandprompt.com>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2012-02-25T19:37:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Le vendredi 24 février 2012 14:18:44, Florian Weimer a écrit : > * Alex Shulgin: > >> It's ugly, but it's standard practice, and seems better than a separate > >> -d parameter (which sort of defeats the purpose of URIs). > > > > Hm, do you see anything what's wrong with "?dbname=other" if you don't > > like a separate -d? > > It's not nice URI syntax, but it's better than an out-of-band mechanism. I've not followed all the mails about this feature but I don't find it is a nice syntax too. "?dbname=other" looks like dbname is an argument, but dbname is a requirement for postgresql connexion. -- Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52 http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation