Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, aidan@highrise.ca, stark@mit.edu, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-01-06T01:10:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Simon Riggs (simon@2ndQuadrant.com) wrote: > I discover that non-all-zeroes holes are fairly common, just not very frequent. Curious, might be interesting to find out why. > That may or may not be a problem, but not something to be dealt with > here and now. But I agree that it's not the job of this patch/effort. It sounds like we have clear indication, however, that those areas, as they are not necessairly all zeros, should be included in the checksum. Thanks, Stephen