Re: pg_signal_backend() asymmetry
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Date: 2012-09-26T20:54:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I'm marking this patch Ready for Committer. I suggest backpatching it to 9.2;
the patch corrects an oversight in 9.2 changes. There's more compatibility
value in backpatching than in retaining distinct behavior for 9.2 only.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:32:41AM -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> ! if (!superuser())
> {
> /*
> ! * Since the user is not superuser, check for matching roles.
> */
> ! if (proc->roleId != GetUserId())
> ! return SIGNAL_BACKEND_NOPERMISSION;
> }
I would have collapsed the conditionals and deleted the obvious comment:
if (!(superuser() || proc->roleId == GetUserId()))
return SIGNAL_BACKEND_NOPERMISSION;
The committer can do that if desired; no need for another version.
Thanks,
nm