Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-08-30T20:44:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Teach AbortOutOfAnyTransaction to clean up partially-started transactions.
- 2755abf386e6 9.2.0 cited
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 09:20:43AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > >> Yeah, Jeff's experiments indicated that the remaining bottleneck is lock > >> management in the server. What I fixed so far on the pg_dump side > >> should be enough to let partial dumps run at reasonable speed even if > >> the whole database contains many tables. But if psql is taking > >> AccessShareLock on lots of tables, there's still a problem. > > > > Ok, I modified the part of pg_dump where tremendous number of LOCK > > TABLE are issued. I replace them with single LOCK TABLE with multiple > > tables. With 100k tables LOCK statements took 13 minutes in total, now > > it only takes 3 seconds. Comments? > > Shall I commit to master and all supported branches? Was this applied? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +