Re: Unreproducible bug in snapshot import code
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-08-16T22:44:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Don't trust deferred-unique indexes for join removal.
- 0f39d5050dc0 9.2.0 cited
Attachments
- psql.diff (text/x-diff) patch
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:07:25AM -0400, Gurjeet Singh wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Gurjeet Singh wrote: > > > > I have tried reproducing the bug starting from 1 and 2 transactions > > > before > > > > the one shown in snippet, and I used tab-completion to get the same > > > > screen-output as termonal1.txt and yet it's not reproducible. > > > > > > I could reproduce it when I typed TAB just after typing "set" in "set > > > transaction snapshot". > > > As Tom and Alvaro pointed out, the tab-completion issues a query and > which > > > prevents the "set transaction snapshot" command. > > > > > > > Great! That settles it then. Reproducible, but not a bug. > > Yes, it is only tabs that query the database for completion that cause > this. Should this be documented somehow? (No idea how.) > > > If we have a doc section on psql's tab-completion, I think this needs to go > there. A note like: > > "Trying to tab-complete on psql may send queries to the server, and depending > on the transaction state, execution of these queries may lead to non-default/ > unexpected behaviour by the queries executed after tab-completion. For example, > ..." I have added the attached patch to document this limitation. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +