Horton
Menu

Re: -Wformat-zero-length

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

View thread
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-08-08T21:15:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, Aug  8, 2012 at 04:23:04PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Yes, the list of rough edges is the 14-steps you have to perform to run
> > pg_upgrade, as documented in the pg_upgrade manual page:
> >
> >         http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/pgupgrade.html
> >
> > The unknown is how to reduce the number of steps in a way the community
> > would find acceptable.
> 
> I think this is one good idea:
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/29806.1340655654@sss.pgh.pa.us
> 
> The number of steps is an issue, but the likelihood of the actual
> pg_upgrade run failing or doing the wrong thing is also something we
> need to work on.

If we currently require 14 steps to use pg_upgrade, how would that
reduce this number?  What failures does it fix?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +