Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-07-10T16:17:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- pg_upgrade.diff (text/x-diff) patch
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:04:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > + While a Log-Shipping Standby Server (<xref linkend="warm-standby">) can > > + be upgraded, the server must be in changed to a primary server to allow > > + writes, and after the upgrade it cannot be reused as a standby server. > > + (Running <command>rsync</> after the upgrade allows reuse.) > > "in changed"? This sentence makes no sense at all to me. Oops. New wording attached with "in" removed: the server must be changed to a primary server -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +