Thread

1. Update comments for PGPROC/PGXACT split

   Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> — 2012-05-13T20:52:31Z

   Many comment references to PGPROC and MyProc should now refer to PGXACT and
   MyPgXact.  This patch attempts to cover all such cases.  In some places, a
   comment refers collectively to all the xid-related fields, which span both
   structures.  I variously changed those to refer to either or both structures
   depending on how I judged the emphasis.
   
   The PGXACT patch extracted the PGPROC struct formerly embedded in each
   GlobalTransaction.  I updated a few comments accordingly.
   
   The procarray.c leading comment described the procarray as "unsorted", but it
   is sorted by memory address; I removed that word.
   
   I include two typo-only fixes on related but already-accurate lines.
   
   Thanks,
   nm
   

2. Re: Update comments for PGPROC/PGXACT split

   Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> — 2012-05-14T07:30:37Z

   On 13.05.2012 23:52, Noah Misch wrote:
   > Many comment references to PGPROC and MyProc should now refer to PGXACT and
   > MyPgXact.  This patch attempts to cover all such cases.  In some places, a
   > comment refers collectively to all the xid-related fields, which span both
   > structures.  I variously changed those to refer to either or both structures
   > depending on how I judged the emphasis.
   >
   > The PGXACT patch extracted the PGPROC struct formerly embedded in each
   > GlobalTransaction.  I updated a few comments accordingly.
   >
   > The procarray.c leading comment described the procarray as "unsorted", but it
   > is sorted by memory address; I removed that word.
   >
   > I include two typo-only fixes on related but already-accurate lines.
   
   Thanks, applied!
   
   -- 
      Heikki Linnakangas
      EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com