Re: Draft release notes complete

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>

Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Date: 2012-05-10T17:21:07Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Expose track_iotiming information via pg_stat_statements.
- 5b4f34661143 9.2.0 cited
Rewrite GiST support code for rangetypes.
- 80da9e68fdd7 9.2.0 cited
Clean up a couple of box gist helper functions.
- d50e1251946a 9.2.0 cited
Replace the "New Linear" GiST split algorithm for boxes and points with a
- 7f3bd86843e5 9.2.0 cited

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:55:37AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 5/10/12 9:44 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On tor, 2012-05-10 at 10:44 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> The big take-away is that the release notes are mostly for blame and
> >> to designate a go-to person for feature problems, not for giving
> >> credit,
> > 
> > Then reviewers should be removed.
> 
> I disagree.  We're trying to get more reviewers, and encourage them to
> do more reviewing.  Giving credit is a big part of that.

OK, we are officially now "all over the map" on this!  I did favor
reviewers over committers for the purpose of encouragement.  I am fine
with anything that has the same or fewer names than we have now.  I
don't think anyone is arguing for more names, so at least we have a
direction.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +