Re: Request to add options to tools/git_changelog
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Jay Levitt <jay.levitt@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2012-05-02T16:39:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 02:06:48PM -0400, Jay Levitt wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > >I am again requesting the addition of options to tools/git_changelog so > >I can more easily produce the release notes. I asked for this during > >9.1 development and it was rejected. I am currently using my own > >custom version of the tool, but have to merge community improvements > >into the tool every year before I use it. > > FYI in the general case of "I have to maintain a patch set": Now > that PG is on git, there's a tool called Stacked Git that lets you > use git's excellent merge capabilities to maintain patches. > > http://www.procode.org/stgit/ I am unclear what stgit does that can't be done with git branches? It mentions pushing and popping patches --- is that it? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +