Re: [BUG] Checkpointer on hot standby runs without looking checkpoint_segments
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: masao.fujii@gmail.com
Cc: heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-04-27T07:52:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Sorry for broken message. > >From I said that the former (spinlock) could be dropped, but the > latter (read as volatile) should be needed. I said that the former (spinlock) could be dropped from the view of functionarity, but the latter (read as volatile) should be needed. > >From the view of maintenancibility (suspicious-proof > expression?), it may be preferable that the manner to read shared > memory be uniform whole source code if no particular reasons. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center == My e-mail address has been changed since Apr. 1, 2012.