Re: Request to add options to tools/git_changelog
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-04-26T05:01:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 05:09:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > The attached patch gives you an idea of what I want to add. > > This patch doesn't seem to be against HEAD? Yes, if people approve, I will work on a current patch against HEAD. > > --details-after Show branch and author info after the commit description > > I don't understand the point of that. The release notes have the author at the end of the text. > > --master-only Show commits made exclusively to the master branch > > Agreed, this could be useful. > > > --oldest-first Show oldest commits first > > This also seems rather useless in comparison to how much it complicates > the code. We don't sort release note entries by commit date, so what's > it matter? It is very hard to read the commit messages newest-first because they are often cummulative, and the order of items of equal weight is oldest-first in the release notes. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +