Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-28T14:18:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > > OK, then the simplest fix, once you modify pg_dumpall, would be to
> > > modify pg_upgrade to remove reference to the postgres database in the
> > > new cluster if it doesn't exist in the old one. ?That would allow
> > > pg_upgrade to maintain a 1-1 matching of databases in the old and new
> > > cluster --- it allows the change to be locallized without affecting much
> > > code.
> > 
> > That sounds just fine.  +1.
> 
> FYI, I don't want to modify pg_dumpall myself because I didn't want to
> have pg_upgrade forcing a pg_dumpall change that applies to
> non-binary-upgrade dumps.  pg_dumpall is too important.  I am fine if
> someone else does it, though.  :-)

If you want crazy, you could suppress the "\connect postgres" line only
in --binary-upgrade dumps, but that seems to error-prone because then
only --binary-upgrade dumps are exercising that behavior.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +