Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-28T14:18:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > OK, then the simplest fix, once you modify pg_dumpall, would be to > > > modify pg_upgrade to remove reference to the postgres database in the > > > new cluster if it doesn't exist in the old one. ?That would allow > > > pg_upgrade to maintain a 1-1 matching of databases in the old and new > > > cluster --- it allows the change to be locallized without affecting much > > > code. > > > > That sounds just fine. +1. > > FYI, I don't want to modify pg_dumpall myself because I didn't want to > have pg_upgrade forcing a pg_dumpall change that applies to > non-binary-upgrade dumps. pg_dumpall is too important. I am fine if > someone else does it, though. :-) If you want crazy, you could suppress the "\connect postgres" line only in --binary-upgrade dumps, but that seems to error-prone because then only --binary-upgrade dumps are exercising that behavior. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +