Horton

Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

View thread
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-15T00:26:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Oops, I see a problem.  Right now, our first major release has no zero,
> > e.g. 9.2, while our minors have a third digit, 9.2.5.  The problem is
> > that with this patch it is confusing to have a psql config file that
> > matches 9.2.0, but not 9.2.5, because you can't write 9.2.0.
> 
> Uh, this seems like nonsense.  We've been labeling major releases with
> a dot-zero for some time, and that's embedded in process now (cf
> version_stamp.pl) to the point that we're unlikely to forget to do so.

Ah, I see now.  9.1 has:

	#define PG_VERSION "9.1.0"

I rarely see the non-dev trees.  No problem then.

Patch applied.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +