Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-14T15:05:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- /rtmp/psql (text/x-diff) patch
Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mi? may 25 16:07:55 -0400 2011: > >> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > >> > > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar may 24 17:11:17 -0400 2011: > >> > >> Right. ?It would also increase the cognitive load on the user to have > >> > >> to remember the command-line go-to-line-number switch for his editor. > >> > >> So I don't particularly want to redesign this feature. ?However, I can > >> > >> see the possible value of letting EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH be set from > >> > >> the same place that you set EDITOR, which would suggest that we allow > >> > >> the value to come from an environment variable. ?I'm not sure whether > >> > >> there is merit in allowing both that source and ~/.psqlrc, though > >> > >> possibly for Windows users it might be easier if ~/.psqlrc worked. > >> > > >> > > If we're going to increase the number of options in .psqlrc that do not > >> > > work with older psql versions, can I please have .psqlrc-MAJORVERSION or > >> > > some such? ?Having 8.3's psql complain all the time because it doesn't > >> > > understand "linestyle" is annoying. > >> > > >> > 1. I thought we already did have that. > >> > >> Oh, true, we have that, though it's not very usable because you have to > >> rename the file from .psqlrc-9.0.3 to .psqlrc-9.0.4 when you upgrade, > >> which is kinda silly. > > > > True. ?We don't add configuration changes in minor versions so having > > minor-version granularity makes no sense. > > > > The attached patch changes this to use the _major_ version number for > > psql rc files. ?Does this have to be backward-compatible? ?Should I > > check for minor and major matches? ?That is going to be confusing to > > document. > > Checking for a minor match and then a major match seems sensible. Done, and documented in the attached patch. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +