Re: ts_rank

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
Cc: Mark <Marek.Balgar@seznam.cz>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Date: 2011-10-13T18:17:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> I'm sorry, my plane to Nepal is waiting me :) I'll be back in the
> midst of November. In short, ts_rank is based only on frequencies of lexems
> and doesn't count distance between query lexems. Also, it supports only
> primitive queries.

Thanks.  Attached doc patch applied to head and 9.1.X.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


> 
> Oleg
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Mark wrote:
> >>>> There's some potentially useful information here:
> >>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/textsearch-controls.html#TEXTSEARCH-RANKING
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for reply. I was reading the documentation of PostgreSQL, but there
> >>> it is not written the name of the used methods. Everywhere there is written,
> >>> that ts_rank use standard ranking function. But it is difficult to say which
> >>> is the standard function.
> >>> Somewhere I found that it is maybe based on Vector space model and it seems
> >>> to be truth, because in the code of tsrank.c is counted the frequency of
> >>> words, but I am not sure of that :-(
> >>
> >> Oleg, Teodor, can you give me a description of how ts_rank decided how
> >> to rank items?  Thanks.
> >
> > Any news on this question?
> >
> >
> 
>  	Regards,
>  		Oleg
> _____________________________________________________________
> Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
> Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
> phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +