Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation
Dan Ports <drkp@csail.mit.edu>
From: Dan Ports <drkp@csail.mit.edu>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@endpoint.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-10-10T21:55:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 04:10:18PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Did you ever see much contention on > SerializablePredicateLockListLock, or was it just > SerializableXactHashLock? I think the former might be able to use > the non-blocking techniques, but I fear the main issue is with the > latter, which seems like a harder problem. No, not that I recall -- if SerializablePredicateLockListLock was on the list of contended locks, it was pretty far down. SerializableXactHashLock was the main bottleneck, and SerializableXactFinishedListLock was a lesser but still significant one. Dan -- Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/