Horton

Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

View thread
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, "Mr. Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@gentoo.org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-03T22:44:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Fix nested PlaceHolderVar expressions that appear only in targetlists.

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/03/2011 04:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On m?n, 2011-10-03 at 15:09 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Why were people not using pg_ctl?  Because of the limitations which
> >> were fixed in PG 9.1?  As Dave already said, windows already has to
> >> use pg_ctl.
> > Historically, pg_ctl has had a lot of limitations.  Just off the top of
> > my head, nonstandard ports used to break it, nonstandard socket
> > directories used to break it, nonstandard authentication setups used to
> > break it, the waiting business was unreliable, the stop modes were weird
> > and not flexible enough, the behavior in error cases does not conform to
> > LSB init script conventions, there were some race conditions that I
> > don't recall the details of right now.  And you had to keep a list of
> > exactly which of these bugs were addressed in which version.
> 
> 
> I'm not sure ancient history helps us much here.  Many of these went 
> away long ago.

Agreed.  You could argue that pg_ctl 9.1 is much better than anything
anyone would be able to craft in a script.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +