Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-03-05T17:55:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Further refine patch for commenting operator implementation functions.
- 908ab8028640 9.1.0 cited
-
Fix citext's upgrade-from-unpackaged script to set its collation correctly.
- 94be9e3f0ca9 9.1.0 cited
-
Mark operator implementation functions as such in their comments.
- 94133a935414 9.1.0 cited
-
Add KNNGIST support to contrib/btree_gist.
- 8436489c81c2 9.1.0 cited
-
Fix plpython breakage detected on certain Fedora machines on buildfarm.
- 4c966d920fb7 9.1.0 cited
On Saturday 05 March 2011 18:43:31 Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > I have a WIP patch fixing one of the two issues. > > > > Several places in selfuncs.c didn't setup collations. That lead for > > example to errors during patternsel. > > Hmm. I have to say that this seems like quite the wrong way to go. > If everyplace in the system that could be calling a collation-sensitive > function has to be modified like this, we'll be fighting bugs of > omission till h*ll freezes over. Why aren't we just setting > finfo.fn_collation to DEFAULT_COLLATION_OID by default, or maybe better > letting places that inspect it take zero as meaning default collation? > Call sites should only need to call fmgr_info_collation() if they have > an explicit non-default collation to pass in. I wondered the same. On the other hand it makes errors like the one during index build way much harder to catch... Andres