Re: exposing COPY API

花田茂 <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp>

From: Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp>

To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2011-02-09T12:38:54Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Allow the low level COPY routines to read arbitrary numbers of fields.
- af1a614ec6d0 9.1.0 cited

On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 08:49:36 -0500
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Shigeru HANADA
> <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp> wrote:
> > I'll submit revised file_fdw patch after removing IsForeignTable()
> > catalog lookup along Heikki's proposal.
> 
> So I'm a bit confused.  I don't see the actual copy API change patch
> anywhere here.  Are we close to getting something committed there?

I'm sorry but I might have missed your point...

I replied here to answer to Itagaki-san's mention about typos in
file_fdw patch.

Or, would you mean that file_fdw should not depend on "copy API change"
patch?

Regards,
--
Shigeru Hanada