Re: multiple -f support

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Mark Wong <markwkm@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, gabrielle <gorthx@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, David Christensen <david@endpoint.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-06T16:16:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I assume having psql support multiple -f files is not a high priority or
something we don't want.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mark Wong wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I took a stab at changing this up a little bit.  I pushed the logic
> that David introduced down into process_file().  In doing so I changed
> up the declaration of process_file() to accept an additional parameter
> specifying how many files are being passed to the function.  Doing it
> this way also makes use of the logic for the current single
> transaction flag without turning it into dead code.
> 
> I also added a check to return EXIT_FAILURE if any error was thrown
> from any of the sql files used, thus stopping execution of any further
> file.  Gabrielle tells me the error echoed in this event is not clear
> so there is still a little more work that needs to be done.
> 
> Regards,
> Mark

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +