Re: ALTER TYPE 2: skip already-provable no-work rewrites
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-01-27T19:48:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Change ALTER TABLE SET WITHOUT OIDS to rewrite the whole table to physically
- 6d1e36185208 8.4.0 cited
Attachments
- at0,2v4-skip-nowork.patch (text/plain) patch
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 07:31:40AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > I'd also suggest that this big if-block you changed to a case > statement could just as well stay as an if-block. There are only > three cases, and we want to avoid rearranging things more than > necessary. It complicates both review and back-patching to no good > end. Okay. I've also left out the large reindent in ATRewriteTable for now. Easy to re-add it later if desired. > I think you should collect up what's left of ALTER TABLE 0 and the > stuff on this thread, rebase it, and submit it as a single patch on > this thread that applies directly against the master branch. We may > decide to split it back up again in some other way, but I think the > current division isn't actually buying us much. Done as attached. This preserves compatibility with our current handling of composite type dependencies. The rest you've seen before. Thanks, nm