Re: ToDo List Item - System Table Index Clustering

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

Cc: saiken@quietlycompetent.com, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2011-01-21T15:00:14Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Add new buffers_backend_fsync field to pg_stat_bgwriter.
- 3134d8863e84 9.1.0 cited

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Simone Aiken
> <saiken@quietlycompetent.com> wrote:
> > After playing with this in benchmarks and researching the weird results I
> > got I'm going to advise dropping the todo for now unless something happens
> > to change how postgres handles clustering.
> 
> I agree, let's remove it.
> 
> That having been said, analyzing TODO items to figure out which ones
> are worthless is a useful thing to do, so please feel free to keep at
> it.

OK, removed.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +