Thread
-
Re: WAL logging volume and CREATE TABLE
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> — 2011-08-03T18:52:01Z
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar ago 02 22:46:55 -0400 2011: > > > I have created a documentation patch to clarify this, and to mention > > CREATE TABLE AS which also has this optimization. > > It doesn't seem particularly better to me. How about something like > > In minimal level, WAL-logging of some operations can be safely skipped, > which can make those operations much faster (see <blah>). Operations on > which this optimization can be applied include: > <simplelist> > <item>CREATE INDEX</item> > <item>CLUSTER</item> > <item>CREATE TABLE AS</item> > <item>COPY, when tables that were created or truncated in the same > transaction > </simplelist> > > Minimal WAL does not contain enough information to reconstruct the data > from a base backup and the WAL logs, so either <literal>archive</> or > <literal>hot_standby</> level must be used to enable ... Good idea --- updated patch attached. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +