Horton

Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

View thread
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-06-27T18:19:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >> > OK, fair enough. ?Should I apply my ports patch to Postgres 9.2?
> >>
> >> I'm not sure which patch you are referring to.
> >
> > This one which makes 50432 the default port.
> 
> There appear to be some other changes mixed into this patch.

The additional changes were to have the existing environment variables
begin with "PG", as requested.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +