Thread
-
Re: pg_upgrade version check improvements and small fixes
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> — 2011-06-23T01:54:23Z
Dan McGee wrote: > Not sure what the normal process is for patches, but I put together a > few small patches for pg_upgrade after trying to use it earlier today > and staring a non-helpful error message before I finally figured out > what was going on. Thanks for the detailed report and patches. Let me address each one individually. > 0001 is just a simple typo fix, but didn't want to mix it in with the rest. I applied this message capitalization fix to 9.0, 9.1, and master (9.2). > 0002 moves a function around to be declared in the only place it is > needed, and prevents a "sh: /oasdfpt/pgsql-8.4/bin/pg_config: No such > file or directory" error message when you give it a bogus bindir. You are right that I was calling pg_ctl before I had validated the bin directory, and you were right that the function wasn't in an ideal C file. What I did was to move the function, and bundle all the pg_upgrade_support test into that single function, so the function now either errors out or returns void. Patch attached and applied to 9.1 and master. Good catch. > 0003 is what I really wanted to solve, which was my failure with > pg_upgrade. The call to pg_ctl didn't succeed because the binaries > didn't match the data directory, thus resulting in this: > > $ pg_upgrade --check -d /tmp/olddata -D /tmp/newdata -b /usr/bin/ -B /usr/bin/ > Performing Consistency Checks > ----------------------------- > Checking old data directory (/tmp/olddata) ok > Checking old bin directory (/usr/bin) ok > Checking new data directory (/tmp/newdata) ok > Checking new bin directory (/usr/bin) ok > pg_resetxlog: pg_control exists but is broken or unknown version; ignoring it > Trying to start old server .................ok > > Unable to start old postmaster with the command: "/usr/bin/pg_ctl" -l > "/dev/null" -D "/tmp/olddata" -o "-p 5432 -c autovacuum=off -c > autovacuum_freeze_max_age=2000000000" start >> "/dev/null" 2>&1 > Perhaps pg_hba.conf was not set to "trust". > > The error had nothing to do with "trust" at all; it was simply that I > tried to use 9.0 binaries with an 8.4 data directory. My patch checks > for this and ensures that the -D bindir is the correct version, just > as the -B datadir has to be the correct version. I had not thought about testing if the bin and data directory were the same major version, but you are right that it generates an odd error if they are not. I changed your sscanf format string because the version can be just "9.2dev" and there is no need for the minor version. I saw no reason to test if the binary version matches the pg_upgrade version because we already test the cluster version, and we test the cluster version is the same as the binary version. Patch attached and applied to 9.1 and master. > I'm not on the mailing list nor do I have a lot of free time to keep > up with normal development, but if there are quick things I can do to > get these patches in let me know. All done! -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +