Horton

Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

View thread
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-06-22T03:25:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Discussion seems to have ended on this thread without a clear direction.
> 
> I still think the right thing is to just use a non-default port number.
> That gets 90% of the benefit for 10% of the work of any other approach
> (except for the ones for which the ratio is even worse).

I agree.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +