Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users

Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> * Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us) wrote:
> > Having long options mean different than short options seems very
> > confusing.
> 
> Err, that wasn't what I was proposing..  Just having:
> --old-port-during-upgrade
> 
> and similar would have to be used if they want to specify the ports to
> be used during the upgrade proces...
> 
> We just wouldn't have a short-option for that option, since we
> discourage it..

I think that is going to be very hard to document --- seems easier to
just use -p and -P always.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +