Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-06-03T20:36:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > That doesn't mean that better integration cannot be worked on later, but > > this illusion that a bug tracker must have magical total awareness of > > the entire flow of information in the project from day one is an > > illusion and has blocked this business for too long IMO. > > If it has only a partial view of the set of bugs being worked on, it's > not going to meet the goals that are being claimed for it. The problem with a bug tracker that only tracks some bugs is that people will mistakenly believe the system is complete, when it is not. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +