Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

Greg Stark wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ?The number of people reading and replying to
> > emails on pgsql-bugs is already insufficient, perhaps because of the
> > (incorrect) perception that Tom does or will fix everything and no one
> > else needs to care. ?So anything that makes it harder for people to
> > follow along and participate is a non-starter IMV.
> 
> Actually I think most of our bugs don't come in from pgsql-bugs. I
> think we want to add other bugs that come up from discussions on
> -hackers or -general which for whatever reason don't get immediately
> fixed.

Agreed.  At that point the TODO list is no longer needed, perhaps.  It
would be nice to have a system where we could categorize items, and add
"features" as well because the bug/feature distinction is often very
hard to make.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +