Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>

From: "ktm@rice.edu" <ktm@rice.edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>, Kim Bisgaard <kim+pg@alleroedderne.adsl.dk>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Joe Abbate <jma@freedomcircle.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-05-31T15:04:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 09:36:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the archives...
> 
> > I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than a few people 
> > at pgcon and nobody had a good word to say about the search system on 
> > the archives.
> 
> Please note, though, that there is no bug tracker anywhere whose search
> mechanism doesn't suck as much or more.  If you're unhappy with the
> search stuff the solution is to improve it, not bring in another bad
> mechanism.
> 
+1

Ken