Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>
From: "ktm@rice.edu" <ktm@rice.edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>, Kim Bisgaard <kim+pg@alleroedderne.adsl.dk>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Joe Abbate <jma@freedomcircle.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-05-31T15:04:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 09:36:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the archives... > > > I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than a few people > > at pgcon and nobody had a good word to say about the search system on > > the archives. > > Please note, though, that there is no bug tracker anywhere whose search > mechanism doesn't suck as much or more. If you're unhappy with the > search stuff the solution is to improve it, not bring in another bad > mechanism. > +1 Ken