Re: pgindent weirdness
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-04-20T17:16:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Latest consolidated typedef list from buildfarm.
- fe1438da8aa8 9.1.0 cited
Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > > I did carefully warn you about the need to check the effects of the changes > > when I committed the new list. > > > > It looks like quite a few of the deletions come into this category, for > > example just looking at the diff here > > <https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/fe1438da8aa8a45f2cee816eb54841f97d3b2f22#src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list> > > I see AggHashEntryData, AggStatePerAggData, AllocBlockData, and > > AllocChunkData from among the first few that were deleted and all are in the > > same category. > > This implies to me that we changed something about how we handle this > since we did the 9.0 runs, but I don't know what it was. Should I? I think Andrew also supplied the typedef list for the 9.0 run. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +