Re: Typed table DDL loose ends
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Date: 2011-04-18T14:48:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Prevent a rowtype from being included in itself.
- eb51af71f241 9.1.0 cited
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:20:21AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > I tweaked the comments accordingly, and also reverted your change to > the error message, because I don't want to introduce new terminology > here that we're not using anywhere else. FWIW, the term "stand-alone composite type" appears twice in our documentation. > I also thought about making this use parserOpenTable() rather than > relation_open(), but it turns out that's not so easy, because the > typed table name is getting shoved into a TypeName rather than a > RangeVar. I don't think that's the choice I would have made but I'm > not sure how excited it's worth getting about it. I hadn't thought about this angle.