Re: pg_dump --binary-upgrade vs. ALTER TYPE ... DROP ATTRIBUTE
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-04-14T12:36:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix pg_dump to handle collations applied to columns of composite types.
- acfa1f45ed3e 9.1.0 cited
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:46:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > If we adopt the elsewhere-proposed approach of forbidding the use of > > rowtypes to create typed tables, the circularity-checking logic here > > can become simpler. I think it's not actually water-tight right now: > > > rhaas=# create table a (x int); > > CREATE TABLE > > rhaas=# create table b of a; > > CREATE TABLE > > rhaas=# create table c () inherits (b); > > CREATE TABLE > > rhaas=# create table d of c; > > CREATE TABLE > > rhaas=# alter table a of d; > > ALTER TABLE > > "alter table a of d"? What the heck does that mean, and why would it be > a good idea? CREATE TABLE a ...; ...; ALTER TABLE a OF d; = CREATE TABLE a OF d; It's a good idea as a heavy lifter for `pg_dump --binary-upgrade'. See the rest of this thread for the full background.