Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Jan Wieck <wieck@debis.com>, PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-02-28T02:24:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> New lztext data type for compressed text fields > I strongly suggest to not name this new feature. All the attempts to make > it go away silently in 7.1 will get a blow in the face from this. People *will* use it, if it's there. Don't fool yourself. However, we can make it "go away silently" the same way we are making datetime go away: the 7.1 (or whatever) parser can just translate the typename lztext to text. If that weren't feasible then I'd be pretty worried too. regards, tom lane