Re: wCTE behaviour

David Fetter <david@fetter.org>

From: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>

To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>

Date: 2010-12-23T16:55:16Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

wcte_20101222.diff (application/x-patch) patch

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 03:54:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes:
> > On 2010-12-22 8:24 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Is this the patch of record?  There are no changes to the documentation
> >> included.
> 
> > I've kept the documentation as a separate patch, but I haven't touched 
> > it in a very long time.  I will work on the documentation if there's a 
> > chance of the patch getting accepted for 9.1.  This arrangement makes 
> > more sense to me and I'm sure others will agree.
> 
> Well, it's difficult to review a documentation-free patch.

Here's a document-included version :)

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate