Re: wCTE behaviour

On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:33:39PM -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> >This is almost exactly the patch from 2010-02 without
> >CommandCounterIncrement()s.  It's still a bit rough around the
> >edges and needs some more comments, but I'm posting it here
> >anyway.
> >
> >This patch passes all regression tests, but feel free to try to
> >break it, there are probably ways to do that.  This one also has
> >the "always run DMLs to completion, and exactly once" behaviour.
> 
> So this patch was marked "Ready for Committer", but a) no committer
> has picked it up yet and b) Marko has made changes here that nobody
> else has tested out yet that I've seen on the last.  Accordingly,
> that classification may have been optimistic.  It seems to me that
> another testing run-through from someone like David might be
> appropriate to build some confidence this latest patch should be a
> commit candidate.  If there is a committer intending to work on this
> as-is, they haven't identified themselves.

I've tested this one and not managed to break it.  One thing it could
use is support for EXPLAIN ANALYZE.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate