Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?

花田茂 <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp>

From: Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp>

To: jd@commandprompt.com

Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Eric Davies <eric@barrodale.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Date: 2010-11-24T09:58:46Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:22:02 -0800
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 20:18 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > On 23.11.2010 14:22, Shigeru HANADA wrote:
> 
> > > OID is supported to get oid from the source table (yes, it works only
> > > for postgresql_fdw but it seems useful to support).
> > 
> > I don't think that's worthwhile. Oids on user tables is a legacy 
> > feature, not recommended for new applications.
> 
> Agreed. We should do everything we can to NOT encourage their use.

Agreed.  I'll remove OIDs support and repost the patch in new thread.

Regards,
--
Shigeru Hanada