Re: security label support, revised
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-10-13T03:59:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- (unnamed) (text/plain)
Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Shigeru HANADA > <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp> wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:07:33 -0400 > > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I found and fixed a few more issues and committed this. ?The pg_dump > >> support had a few escaping bugs, and I added tab completion support > >> for psql. ?Considering the size of the patch, it seems likely that > >> there are some issues we both overlooked, but this is as solid as I > >> can make it for right now. > > Some OIDs used in SECURITY LABEL patch have already been used for > > some functions such as pg_stat_get_xact_numscans(). > > > > The src/include/catalog/duplicate_oids script reports that 3037 ~ > > 3040 are used two or more times. > > > > Though all regression tests finish successfully, should this be > > fixed ? > > Woops. Thanks for the report, fixed. I wish we had a regression test > that would catch these mistakes. It's easy to forget to run this > script. Attached it the script I use for checks that eventually calls src/tools/pgtest. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +