Re: leaky views, yet again
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-10-07T13:27:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > > This might be overly pedantic, but I don't think 'tampering' gives the > > right impression. > > I'm open to suggestions. Yeah, wasn't coming up with a better word myself. :/ Maybe something with "circumvented"? > > Also, even if you can't create functions (due to lack of create > > privileges on any schema), you could use DO clauses now. Revoking > > usage rights on all languages should prevent both though. > > I don't see how to make it work with a DO clause. Yeah, Heikki pointed out that I was assuming PG could work more magic than it can today. :) Sorry for the noise. Stephen