Horton
Menu

Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

View thread
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-03-11T01:39:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> > I've been playing with vacuum_defer_cleanup_age in reference to the
> > query cancel problem. ?It really seems to me that this is the way
> > forward in terms of dealing with query cancel for normal operation
> > rather than wal_standby_delay, or maybe in combination with it.
> 
> Why isn't vacuum_defer_cleanup_age listed on postgresql.conf.sample?
> Though I also tried to test the effect of it, I was unable to find it
> in the conf file.

I asked about that last week and for some reason Simon didn't want it
added and Greg Smith was going to get this corrected.  Greg?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  PG East:  http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do