Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-02-27T14:34:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Smith wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:43:48 +0000, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> wrote: > > > >> I want my ability to run large batch queries without any performance > >> or reliability impact on the primary server. > >> > > > > +1 > > > > I can use any number of other technologies for high availability. > > > > Remove "must be an instant-on failover at the same time" from the > requirements and you don't even need 9.0 to handle that, this has been a > straightforward to solve problem since 8.2. It's the combination of HA > and queries that make things hard to do. > > If you just want batch queries on another system without being concerned > about HA at the same time, the first option is to just fork the base > backup and WAL segment delivery to another server and run queries there. That is a lot of administrative overhead. It is hard to say it is equivalent to HS. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +