Re: [PATCH] 8.5 TODO: Add comments to output indicating version of pg_dump and of the database server

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>

To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Jim Cox <shakahshakah@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>

Date: 2010-02-23T18:29:43Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane escribió:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> > On 2/23/10 10:14 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >>> What happened to this patch? I don't see any objections, but it was not
> >>> applied.
> >> 
> >> I think that the patch author never added it to the open CommitFest
> >> and nobody else thought it was important enough to pick up.  It looks
> >> innocuous to me; want to go ahead and apply?
> 
> > I'd say yes.  It's post-freeze, but this falls into the class of "oops,
> > we forgot about this patch" which the CFs were designed to prevent.
> 
> That would be an argument for sticking this in the next CF, not for
> applying it now --- it was submitted after the close of the last CF no?

Sep. 29 2009?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support